Prof Zebulon  No E06  

 

A) Creation (Theistic Evolution)

Here is a term that can be classified as an oxymoron.  What it basically means is that God used evolution is His Creation and when the various life-forms were evolving, God sort of helped the process along;  somehow......  As you can imagine, this is not taught in the Bible; so you say, where did it come from?  It came from people who believe that a supreme being does exist and because of the complexity of the Creation, they just don't want to throw everything into the hoary mists of antiquity; they believe in a god; just not the God of the Bible. These were Charles Darwin's very words.  Theistic evolution is also proposed by many Christians who feel they have to stuff millions of years in between each day in the Genesis account of creation.

Another belief system is the Gap Theory. This is another opinion that is held by many fundamentalists who believe that billions of years went by between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2. The main purpose of this theory is to harmonise the Biblical account of Creation with the accepted geological ages, such as the Palaeozoic or the Mesozoic eras.

These theories are not only impossible but are, again, not reasonable.  We will look at these and other issues in later studies.  We will see what the Bible says about creation.

 

D) The Bible (Allegorical or Literal Interpretation)

Interpretation (hermeneutics) of the Bible has been a controversial subject for centuries.  Some believers say that the Bible must not be taken literally but that it must be taken allegorically, that is to say, spiritually. In other words, the terms used in the Bible are not literal events or occurrences but just symbolic representations. An example is the account of Adam and Eve.  Those who hold the allegorical interpretation say that this was not actual disobedience by Adam and Eve but just a figurative expression of man's experience.  There are many examples of this that have grabbed the attention of Christians for years and, sometimes,  to the detriment of the Body of Christ.

The Bible must be taken literally and in its actual context; but you say, there are symbols in the Bible that were meant to be taken figuratively.  Good; use them.   But then you say, how do we know when to interpret literally or allegorically?  Good question!! 

Through the centuries, scholars have found that if the literal interpretation makes sense, don't look any further; otherwise it will be nonsense.  Let me explain. 

        1)   In Revelation 8 verse7 the Bible says that an angel sounded his trumpet and hail and fire mingled with blood fell to the earth; this is not a symbol!  It will be just as the Bible says: hail and fire mingled with blood; remember Moses' plagues to Egypt in Exodus 8, 9, and 10?

        2)   Now let us look at one of the horses in Revelation; the white one.  In chapter 6 verse 2 the Bible says that the white horse had on it a rider who was given a crown and had a bow and went out conquering and to conquer.  This is not a literal horse but a symbol of Antichrist riding on a sort of system where he will conquer the world.  The bow in his hand is definitely a symbol of war but the absence of arrows indicates that he will conquer peacefully.

Interpretation of the Bible is not something to be taken lightly; that is why the Lord gave us the Holy Spirit to enlighten us.   He also gave us our intelligence, our wills and our emotions.  Let us put them to good use and to the Glory of His name.